Peer Review Process & Workflow

Double-blind peer evaluation standards, evaluation criteria, and review timeline.

Double-Blind Peer Review Policy

NNIJAS Journal adheres to a rigorous Double-Blind Peer Review System to ensure unbiased evaluation, scientific integrity, and high academic quality.

Peer Review Workflow Steps:

  1. Initial Screening (Day 1-2): Managing Editor verifies manuscript scope, formatting, and plagiarism check.
  2. Reviewer Assignment (Day 3): Paper is assigned to 2 expert domain peer reviewers without author identities.
  3. Evaluation & Scoring (Day 4-10): Reviewers evaluate novelty, research methodology, statistical accuracy, and conclusions.
  4. Editorial Decision (Day 12-14): Final recommendation (Accept / Minor Revision / Major Revision / Reject) communicated to the author.
Review Timeframe: The average peer review process takes approximately 1 to 2 weeks from initial submission to final editorial decision.